Agent Evaluation Suite

Evaluating agents where real work gets done.

AIPERT builds benchmark tasks, scoring rubrics, and inspection tools for AI agents that operate across files, browsers, code, documents, data, and long-horizon workflows.

Abstract agent evaluation lab with task cards, traces, and benchmark dashboards
Evidence-firstEvery score is connected to artifacts, logs, traces, or human-review checkpoints.
Real workflowsTasks are modeled after professional work rather than short prompt puzzles.
Reproducible runsEvaluation cases are designed for deterministic replay, versioning, and trace analysis.
Reviewable scoringRubrics separate objective checks from expert judgement, risks, and ambiguity.

Benchmark Design

From task construction to final judgement, the benchmark keeps evidence in the loop.

01

Build realistic tasks

We collect agent tasks that require planning, tool use, information synthesis, and artifact delivery across realistic desktop and web environments.

02

Define observable success

Each task includes expected outputs, constraints, validation hooks, and review notes so performance can be inspected instead of guessed.

03

Run, score, and audit

Agents are evaluated with execution traces, intermediate artifacts, final deliverables, and expert review where pure automation is not reliable enough.

Evaluation Philosophy

Harder than a chat benchmark, clearer than a vibes test.

AIPERT focuses on whether an agent can finish work under constraints: read source material, operate tools, revise artifacts, recover from errors, and leave an auditable record of what happened.

Task fidelity

Scenarios preserve the messy structure of real work while keeping evaluation boundaries explicit.

Rubric clarity

Scoring distinguishes exact checks, partial credit, unsafe behavior, and unresolved review items.

Trace literacy

Evaluation includes the path an agent took, not only the final answer it produced.

Release discipline

Public claims will be tied to documented task suites, versioned cases, and reproducible evidence.

Task Domains

Designed for agents that need to act, not just answer.

Software engineering

Repository navigation, issue fixing, regression testing, documentation, and code review.

Data and research

Spreadsheet analysis, web research, citation-aware synthesis, and structured extraction.

Document workflows

Slides, reports, PDFs, spreadsheet artifacts, formatting QA, and revision tasks.

Browser operations

Multi-step browsing, form interaction, page inspection, comparison, and evidence capture.

Tool orchestration

Command-line work, local files, service checks, deployment routines, and recovery from errors.

Reliability and safety

Instruction following, boundary handling, risk awareness, and refusal quality under pressure.

Partners & Contributors

Building verifiable agent evaluation with universities, researchers, and domain experts.

AIPERT's collaboration network will include university labs, workflow experts, evaluation engineers, and student contributors. Confirmed institutions and collaborators will be published here.

Partner institutionsUpdating
University LabsComputer Science SchoolsAI InstitutesSoftware SchoolsData Science CentersInterdisciplinary AI CentersIndustry Intelligence LabsEvaluation Research Groups

Research collaborators

Agent evaluation methodology, task construction, and result analysis.

Domain experts

Real workflows, industry constraints, and expert review standards.

Evaluation engineers

Environment packaging, automated checks, trace capture, and regression validation.

Student contributors

Task curation, annotation review, documentation, and case maintenance.

Roadmap

What will be published

Preview

Benchmark overview, evaluation principles, and representative task categories.

Task suite

Versioned evaluation cases with rubrics, environment notes, and validation artifacts.

Reports

Model and agent results with trace-backed analysis, limitations, and review notes.

Agent evaluation should make progress visible: what was attempted, what worked, what failed, and what still needs human review.

Resources

Research materials and benchmark artifacts will land here as they are released.

Contact

Building reliable agent benchmarks is a team sport.

AIPERT welcomes conversations around task design, evaluation methodology, trace analysis, and domain-specific benchmark construction.

contact@aipert.top